Proceed with Caution
Sure — here’s a draft for a clear, professional, and firm review you could post for your complaint:
---
I rented a home through Pathlight Homes starting in January 2022. In February 2025, Tricon Residential acquired the portfolio. My lease was set to expire in early February 2025, and I chose to renew in January after learning about the acquisition. However, shortly after renewing, I submitted my 60-day notice on January 31, 2025, planning to vacate by March 31, 2025.
I fully understood I would be held to the Early Termination penalties since I had signed the lease, and I accepted that. What I did not accept — and still have major concerns about — are the excessive and questionable charges I was billed after move-out.
I’ve worked in property management for over 11 years and know the industry standard for how move-outs are handled. A move-out statement with inspection details and photos should typically be sent to the tenant within 3-5 days after vacating. I had to follow up repeatedly, and after two weeks, I finally received the statement, which was dated April 5, 2025, but the email wasn’t sent to me until April 14, 2025.
I immediately attempted to dispute the charges. I was told to submit my dispute via email, which I did on April 14 and again on April 16. As of today, April 21, I still have not received a response.
The charges raised several red flags:
- **Utility Transfer Fees:** During the transition from Pathlight to Tricon, Pathlight still had the utilities in their name. I should not have been penalized for a transfer-related charge during that period.
- **Carpet Padding Removal:** The only carpeted area in the home was upstairs. I expected a standard carpet cleaning fee, but not for carpet pad removal — which seems unjustified.
- **Painting Charges:** I had the home painted prior to moving out, including patching and painting all small holes. Yet I was still billed for painting.
- **Blinds Replacement:** Only one blind was cracked, but I was charged $255. I’ve asked multiple times how many blinds were actually replaced, but no clarification has been provided.
- **Tub Replacement:** I was charged for a tub replacement, which I find baffling, as the tubs were in the same condition when I left as when I moved in. One tub upstairs had a visible crack from before I moved in — clearly patched and resurfaced by the previous owner or Pathlight. It remained functional and unchanged during my lease.
I also requested photo documentation of these supposed damages, which to date has never been provided.
This experience has been both frustrating and disappointing — especially given my background in property management and clear understanding of standard move-out expectations. Communication and accountability have been severely lacking throughout this entire process.
I hope this review helps future renters proceed with caution.
Date of experience: April 14, 2025